A report on the representation of Afro- Asian Peoples’ Solidarity Organization (AAPSO) in the Civil Society Forum held in Geneva (29 - 30 June 2006) in the framework of offering the consultative opinion to the ECOSOC High Level Segment (3-5 July 2006)



1- The Forum was held in the framework of CONGO organization that is the Conference of Non-Governmental Organizations in consultative relationship with the United Nations.

2- The purpose of the Forum was to carry out discussions and preparations to agree on specific recommendations to be presented to the ECOSOC High Level Segment.

3- The true determined objective of the recommendations was creating an environment at the national and international levels conducive to generating full and productive employment and decent work for all.

4- The basic objective of the participation of AAPSO representative in the meeting is to participate in the proceedings as well as contributing by a paper in one of the workshops.

5- The Forum included the following proceedings:

a) An opening session chaired by Mrs. Renate Bloem and attended by UN and Swiss government official figures.
b) A keynote speech by Mr. Juan Somavia (ILO Director general).
c) A seminar under the theme: “Economic ethos: would a universal basic income for all be sufficient?” by the Committee on Spirituality Values and Global Concerns. The seminar was moderated by Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger from the University of Geneva. She delivered five lectures in that context.
d) 18 workshops were held in the framework of 6 groups (each group has a key issue) at a rate of 2-4 workshops for each key issue.
e) A general discussion on the recommendations of each group
f) A general discussion on the recommendations of the six groups.
g) Two Occasions (Reception and acquaintanceship) by the end of the days 29 and 30 June.
h) A field visit to a cooperative farm at Geneva suburbs (1 July).

(6)The Keynote speech of ILO Director General:
The speech took 45 minutes. The key messages of the speech were the following:
- For the past 25 years, a contraction in Labour value has occurred (consequently a contraction in the value of humanity).
- The real life of people is in localities (i.e. the places where they live).
- Formal jobs contribute to achieving social security.
- The value of international transactions (or game) is made in particular for the strongest.
- Policies that result in conflicts come essentially from the international level.
- The unemployed person is similar to a football that is kicked between the politician’s feet. A matter that necessitates elevating employment issue above policy levels.


(7) The seminar “Economic ethos: would a universal basic income for all be sufficient?”

The five introduced lectures included viewpoints on the value of labour as well as analyzing and crossing the gab between the theoretical thought and practical reality. The participation of AAPSO’s representative came at the end of the session where it directed the attention to the need of tracing the mechanisms of depowerment for peoples on the national and international levels as well as focusing on networking in the tracing process as being a strategic entry for empowering the people of the South in particular (the peoples of the North and the South equally). The moderator of the seminar requested to consider this speech a general conclusion of the seminar.


(8) AAPSO’s representative participated in the second workshop of the second Group. The topic of the workshop was “Social Dialogue and Alliance Building” as a part of the second group’s issue that was titled “Creating an enabling Environment at the national level conducive for growth and employment. The workshop included three speakers:
- Mrs. Mama Koita Doumbia - representative of African Women’s
Development and Communication Network. She spoke of Mali experience.
- Mr. Alagandram Sivananthiram-ILO representative. He spoke of the experience of Social Dialogue in some countries.
- Mr. Mohamed Raouf Hamed. His speech was titled “Towards a more potential for systemic empowerment”

* Regarding Mrs. Mama’s lecture (the paper was not circulated). The most significant aspect that attracted the attention was the success of civil society in lobbying to become a partner (in addition to the government) in the dialogue with donor international agencies especially the International Monetary Fund.
* As for Mr. Alagandram’s lecture the most significant attracting elements were the reasons behind the success of social dialogue in some countries, of which are:
- The parallelism of social development process and productivity (Japan case).
- The sincere desire of government to build capacity for dialogue (Singapore case).
- The workers’ strong contribution to social dialogue (Hong Kong Case).

Mr. Alagandram concluded by the importance of government’s conviction (i.e. the government’s belief) of the necessity of social dialogue.

* Regarding AAPSO’s representative paper, it was the only written paper in the workshop. It was circulated among all participants. The paper had its own reflection over discussions and influence on the recommendations, in particular the sixth recommendation of the second workshop, cluster 2.


(9) The process of reaching the recommendations was carried out in a Democratic framework through three stages:
- Discussion of the papers of each workshop.
- Discussion of the workshops recommendations in the group meeting which comprised a number of workshops.
- Discussion of the groups’ recommendations in a big meeting attended by all participants in the Forum.


(10) In the framework of the Forum’s proceedings and the two receptions, Acquaintances with many individuals, organizations were made. In addition to identifying many activities from different countries of the world in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Australia and Europe.

(11) Important remarks:
-The Africans were the most committed participants to the Forum’s
Proceedings (regarding the subjects and timings)
- It was obvious that all participants objectively understood the unethical approaches of American policy and brutal imperialism as well as the interaction between such approaches.
- The attention to the necessity of paying the appropriate consideration to the emergence of new groups and potentials in civil work on the national and international levels acting in specified social frameworks. Their actions have strong empowering reflections to improve conditions in the world.
- The importance of communicating the activities of AAPSO with the new social civil work on the national, regional and international levels.
- An example of new civil work groups is a cooperative farm located at the sides of Geneva. (AAPSO representative with a group of the Forum’s participants visited the farm on 1/7/2006). Such farm achieved local successes. It communicated as well with other farms in Africa for exchanging experiences.
 

Home :: About Us :: Contact Us

Home :: About Us :: Contact Us